September 7, 2009
PL 301--Torts
In class today, Monday 9/7, we finished our discussion of Alexander v. Mitchell. We talked about how the Law Court treated the primary cases relied on by the parties, Budzko and Denman. I corrected the Alexander sample Brief to include the crucial "not" into the Holding. I also went over 2 additional Maine cases that discussed "duty", Joy v. EMMC, 529 A.2d 1364 (Me., 1987) and Flanders v. Cooper, 1998 ME 28, 706 A.2d 589. The assignment for Wednesday 9/9 is to review that which had been previously assigned for today--i.e. read chapter 2 of the text, and prepare to discuss the Exercises on pp. 27 and 28 (except for the first Exercise).
In class today, Monday 9/7, we finished our discussion of Alexander v. Mitchell. We talked about how the Law Court treated the primary cases relied on by the parties, Budzko and Denman. I corrected the Alexander sample Brief to include the crucial "not" into the Holding. I also went over 2 additional Maine cases that discussed "duty", Joy v. EMMC, 529 A.2d 1364 (Me., 1987) and Flanders v. Cooper, 1998 ME 28, 706 A.2d 589. The assignment for Wednesday 9/9 is to review that which had been previously assigned for today--i.e. read chapter 2 of the text, and prepare to discuss the Exercises on pp. 27 and 28 (except for the first Exercise).
posted by sol goldman | 5:12 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home